BCPS COPD: The Gold Guidelines (2013)

inhalers.jpg

The Gold Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of COPD are the gold standard for treating COPD.  

About Us
The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) works with health care professionals and public health officials around the world to raise awareness of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and to improve prevention and treatment of this lung disease.

Through the development of evidence-based guidelines for COPD management, and events such as the annual celebration of World COPD Day, GOLD is working to improve the lives of people with COPD in every corner of the globe.

Who Are We?
GOLD was launched in 1997 in collaboration with the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, USA, and the World Health Organization.

GOLD’s program is determined and its guidelines for COPD care are shaped by committees made up of leading experts from around the world.

COPD is an inflammatory response characterized by persistent airflow limitations that is progressive in nature.  Exacerbations and comorbidities contribute to the overall severity in patients.

Symptoms:  Dyspnea, chronic cough, chronic sputum production

Spirometry is required to make a clinical diagnosis of COPD; the presence of a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.70 confirms the presence of persistent airflow limitation and thus of COPD.

Causes:  Smoking, indoor air pollution, occupational dusts and chemicals, and outdoor air pollution

Differential Diagnosis:

  1. COPD:  Onset in mid-life.  Symptoms slowly progress.  Usually a history of smoking.
  2. Asthma:  Onset usually early in life.  Symptoms vary day-to-day.  Symptoms worse at night/morning.  Allergy, rhinitis, and/or eczema also present.  Family history.
  3. CHF:  Dilated heart, pulmonary edema on chest x-ray.  Pulmonary function tests show volume restriction, not airflow limitation.
  4. Bronchiectasis:  Usually associated with bacterial infection.  Lots of purulent sputum.  Chest x-ray/CT shows bronchial dilation and wall thickening.
  5. TB:  can confirm with microbiological testing.  Lung infiltrates.

The complete report (lengthy) can be found
www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Report_2013_Feb20.pdf

The At A Glance COPD Management Refernce guide (short 8 pages)
www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_AtAGlance_2013_Feb20.pdf

The pocket guide (32 pages) for Health Care Professionals for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention is 
www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLD_Pocket_2013_Mar27.pdf

The GOLD classifications are the main method doctors use to describe the severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

GOLD is short for the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, a collaboration between the National Institutes of Health and the World Health Organization.

What Is GOLD Staging for COPD?

The GOLD staging system classifies people with COPD based on their degree of airflow limitation (obstruction). The airflow limitation is measured during pulmonary function tests (PFTs).

When blowing out forcefully, people with normal lungs can exhale most of the air in their lungs in one second. Pulmonary function tests measure this and other values, and are used to diagnose COPD and its severity:

  • The volume in a one-second forced exhalation is called the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), measured in liters.
  • The total exhaled breath is called the forced vital capacity (FVC), also measured in liters.
  • In people with normal lung function, FEV1 is at least 70% of FVC.

Because of lung damage, people with COPD take longer to blow air out. This impairment is called obstruction or airflow limitation. An FEV1 less than 70% of FVC can make the diagnosis of COPD in someone with compatible symptoms and history.

In GOLD COPD, classifications are then used to describe the severity of the obstruction or airflow limitation. The worse a person's airflow limitation is, the lower their FEV1. As COPD progresses, FEV1 tends to decline. GOLD COPD staging uses four categories of severity for COPD, based on the value of FEV1:

Stage I:  Mild COPD - FEV1/FVC<0.70 - FEV1 ≥ 80% normal

Stage II:  Moderate COPD - FEV1/FVC<0.70 - FEV1 50-79% normal

Stage III:  Severe COPD - FEV1/FVC<0.70 - FEV1 30-49% normal

Stage IV:  Very Severe COPD - FEV1/FVC<0.70 - FEV1 <30% normal, or <50% normal with chronic respiratory failure present*

* Usually, this means requiring long-term oxygen therapy.

What Do the GOLD COPD Classifications Mean?

The GOLD COPD criteria are an attempt by health experts to group people together based on the severity of their COPD. This process is called COPD staging. Accurate staging, or knowing the severity of your COPD, could have various benefits, such as:

  • Helping people with COPD understand their disease better
  • Helping doctors make better treatment recommendations for people with COPD
  • Helping people with COPD plan for their future, and predict life expectancy

The GOLD COPD staging system can be helpful toward these goals. But the system is not accurate or precise enough to predict symptoms or life expectancy in individual people living with COPD.

One problem is that the GOLD COPD classifications only consider a person's degree of airflow obstruction. On average, people with severe airflow obstruction from COPD do have worse symptoms and a shorter life expectancy than people with mild obstruction. However, many other factors beside airflow obstruction influence breathing symptoms and life expectancy, such as:

  • Overweight and obesity
  • Smoking status
  • Other medical conditions, especially heart disease
  • Physical fitness and exercise habits

Here is a guideline summary that is pretty in-depth.

Remember what you need to make a diagnosis:  spirometry.  Remember the categories.  Remember the treatments for each category.



10 Rules of Email Etiquette at Work

One of the most frustrating things about pharmacy jobs today, for me at least, is the lack of email etiquette at work.  I know it sounds crazy to even bring this up, but I have been pondering this post for years.  You see, I have been guilty of not being the best at email, but over the years it is becoming crystal clear the errors people make every single day that not only make the sender look badly, but can actually fracture a team.  Without further ado, the email changes I would like to see in the pharmacy and hospital world with a disclaimer that since I have been practicing for almost 15 years, these examples go way back in time. 1.  REFRAIN FROM REACTIVE EMOTIONAL EMAILS.  If you find yourself getting worked up over what you are reading, do your best to avoid pressing reply and firing off a response.  Avoid sending emails when you’re feeling any type of negative emotion. These types of emails will ALWAYS make you look unprofessional and maybe even unstable.  Before you send off that email rant or reply to an email that angers you, try cooling off overnight.  Or, write an uncensored draft that you never actually send. Remember that all emails are forwardable.  If you don't want your whole department to read it, do not send it.

2.  RESIST THE REPLY ALL BUTTON.  This is the one that literally will make my entire head explode at work.  I have seen coworker after coworker make this mistake and it is not pretty.  This can make you look totally clueless all the way up the chain.  Coworkers don't let coworkers reply all.  In fact, I would love to see the day when reply all is no longer an option in Outlook, Gmail, or any other email client.  Why?  Because it creates mindless replies when all of the discussion could be tabled and then ONE single email sent out to a team.  Time after time in all of my jobs have seen emails go out - an official type declaration of what we are going to be doing - and someone else will reply all and jump in with something else essentially calling out critically all the things wrong with the initial.  Take the time to call the person that sent the email and give them the professional courtesy to make any corrections.  Don't shoot the messenger!

3.  UNDERSTAND WHAT CC AND BCC MEAN.  The recipients listed in the To field are the direct addressees of your email. These are the people to whom you are writing directly.  CC, which stands for “carbon copy” or even “courtesy copy,” is for anyone you want to keep in the loop but are not addressing directly in the email. The person(s) in the CC field is being sent a copy of your email as an FYI. Commonly, people CC their supervisors to let them know an email has been sent/an action has been taken or to provide a record of communications. The general rule of thumb is that recipients in the To field are expected to reply or follow up to the email, while those in the CC field do not.  So many times I see the ones in the CC field adding in their two-cents and then the whole thing becomes a reply-all festival.

4. IF YOU ADD SOMEONE IN THE CC OR TO FIELD, LET THE OTHERS KNOW.  Guess what?  There are times when people are added willy-nilly for no good reason and you look back and notice it a couple of emails later.  Let people know.  Professional courtesy and politeness go a long way.

5.  BCC IS GOOD FOR ONE THING ONLY.  Let's say that only half in your department contributed to the annual walk fund.  Rather than sending out an email to all those that contribute in the TO field where each of them can see who did contribute and who did not, put your own name in the TO and the rest in the BCC.  That way, gossip about who gives and doesn't is stopped before it can even begin.  Don't use the BCC field to add someone random to eavesdrop on the email.

6.  PICK UP THE PHONE.  If you notice that you are going back and forth on an email and getting nowhere, the phone still works.  Guess what?  Voices can convey so much more than words and rarely are misinterpreted as much as typed words.  I remember an email I saw that was sent for the third time.  The second time it was heavily highlighted with quotes from the manager's email weeks before.  The third send apologized for resending the email yet again but someone was not doing it correctly.  Because of the sender's frustration, more time was wasted from the entire department reading about some small piece in the whole operation, and worse, half of the department had nothing to do with the infraction.

7.  DON'T PUT A QUOTE IN YOUR SIGNATURE.  There is no reason for it.  From The Wordsmith:

******Avoid quotes, witty sayings and colors in the signature.

8.  DON'T ASSUME EVERYONE READS THEIR EMAIL IMMEDIATELY.  If something is important and needs to be communicated quickly, pick up the phone.

9.  DO NOT FORWARD AN EMAIL UNTIL YOU ASK PERMISSION.  This is just plain common professional sense.

10.  DO NOT USE UNPROFESSIONAL FONTS OR BACKGROUND PAPERS.  They only distract.  This means NO comic sans.

Hope that helps.  And, by the way, I do mess up on some of these myself.

 

 

 

 

Genesis: Wintersong Theme

So basically, I use Genesis to power wordpress on my blog.  Within Genesis you can change out child themes (Genesis considered the "adult" theme).  I have tinkered with different designs, but I am more of a minimalist at heart and while I like the theme I'm running now, Brian Gardner has a theme he made that I love.  In fact, when I chose the one I have now, I thought I was getting the one I want, Wintersong theme. I was wrong, but it's close.

Hoping since I am taking the time to tout this theme on my blog, perhaps I will have a grand chance of winning one of the 10 that he is giving away.

 

 

Oh, Drugmonkey, Latisse Saved My Life

I love Drugmonkey; really I do. His wit and way of writing about all things drug related is inspiring. And I laugh as well. He has a new book coming soon (soon I hope) and an excerpt. And my response though keep in mind very tongue-in-cheek:

2013-03-17_0001No, no, no Drugmonkey (@drugmonkey on Twitter) you just didn't bring up the one drug that has changed my life!  Ah Latisse!  The drug that has made my teeny tiny eyelashes longer without the glue or the accidentally falling off lash accident!

The drug that is only $75 here in my fair city because the demand must not be high.

Did you know you can make that tiny bottle last for months and not just one month?  Does that change your mind about this rip-off drug you so labeled?

Sadly, probably not because you would rather see a lady read a book.  I don't have any pictures of that much to the reader's dismay.

Hypotrichosis had severely limited my self-confidence to the point of being barely unable to function.  I could see the computer screen quite well but just knowing that I barely had any lashes to bat was disabling.  I had considered filing for disability with the government, but since the condition didn't affect my job (well at least in definition) I decided that I would move forward and find my own treatment.

Much to my delight, I found a little physician run botox/latisse/filler "clinic" and went in asking for help.

"Help," I pleased.  "My lashes aren't sexy."

The lady at the counter was moved with my brief history of disease and told me that Latisse was the cure.

I am cured.

Though my wallet is a bit tighter and my lashes are so long now I can barely see the computer screen, I can honestly say that having lashes as long as the Nile has been a complete turnaround in my life.  I am able to bat my lashes to and fro to achieve most anything (well, except it doesn't work on my children, yet) and not only that, I have this bit of discoloration right at the line of my lashes that mimics light brown eyeliner.  Win-win, right?